Systems and methods for enforcing policies in the discovery of anonymizing proxy communications

ABSTRACT

In embodiments of the present invention improved capabilities are described for systems and methods that enforce policies with respect to proxy communications.

BACKGROUND

Proxy servers can enable indirect communications between networkparticipants. Proxy servers can modify these communications so as toinsert content, remove content, obscure a sender or receiver of thecommunications, and so on.

Security policies, administrative policies, and the like may be directedat limiting access to certain websites or network content.

There exists a need for systems and methods that enforce policies withrespect to proxy communications.

SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present invention include systems and methods thatenforce policies with respect to proxy communications. In embodiments,the present invention may be a computer program product embodied in acomputer readable medium that, when executing on one or more computers,enforces policies with respect to proxy communications.

In one aspect, a method and computer program product for identifying aproxy website that is disclosed herein includes analyzing websitecontent that is retrieved based on a website request, wherein theanalysis involves looking for patterns within the website content thatare similar to patterns found in a known non-proxy website's content; inresponse to finding a similar pattern between the requested website andthe known non-proxy website, comparing the requested website'sidentifier with an identifier of the known non-proxy website; and inresponse to finding a mismatch between the two website identifiers,categorizing at least a portion of the requested website's identifier asa suspected proxy website identifier. The known non-proxy website may beone of a plurality of known non-proxy websites that have beenpredetermined as known non-proxy websites. Signature content from theplurality of known non-proxy websites may be stored in a database andthe analysis involves retrieving the signature content and comparing thesignature content to content derived from the retrieved website. Thesignature content may be prioritized based on the non-proxy websitespopularity such that more popular signature content is used in theanalysis before less popular content. The step of analyzing the websitecontent that may be retrieved based on the website request furthercomprises analyzing a plurality of content, retrieved based on aplurality of requests made by the requested website, for a significantnumber of content portions that include patterns matching the knownnon-proxy website. The step of categorizing at least a portion of therequested website's identifier as a suspect proxy website identifier mayinvolve determining a longest common portion of URLs requested by therequested website and categorizing the longest common portion asindicative of a proxy website. The step of looking for patterns withinthe website content that may be similar to patterns found in the knownnon-proxy website's content involves comparing text associated with thetwo websites for similarities. The step of looking for patterns withinthe website content that may be similar to patterns found in the knownnon-proxy website's content involves comparing copyright messagesassociated with the two websites for similarities. The step of lookingfor patterns within the website content that may be similar to patternsfound in the known non-proxy website's content involves comparingcomments within HTML associated with the two websites for similarities.The step of looking for patterns within the website content that may besimilar to patterns found in the known non-proxy website's contentinvolves comparing class names associated with the two websites forsimilarities. The step of looking for patterns within the websitecontent that may be similar to patterns found in the known non-proxywebsite's content involves comparing script components associated withthe two websites for similarities. The step of looking for patternswithin the website content that may be similar to patterns found in theknown non-proxy website's content involves comparing images associatedwith the two websites for similarities. The step of looking for patternswithin the website content that may be similar to patterns found in theknown non-proxy website's content involves comparing links associatedwith the two websites for similarities. The step of looking for patternswithin the website content that may be similar to patterns found in theknown non-proxy website's content involves comparing style elementsassociated with the two websites for similarities. The step of lookingfor patterns within the website content that may be similar to patternsfound in the known non-proxy website's content involves comparing clientside executable content associated with the two websites forsimilarities. The step of looking for patterns within the websitecontent that may be similar to patterns found in the known non-proxywebsite's content involves comparing elements within HTTP headersreturned by a server associated with the two websites for similarities.

In one aspect, a method of identifying a proxy website that is disclosedherein includes analyzing website content that is retrieved based on awebsite request, wherein the analysis involves looking for patternswithin the website content that are similar to patterns found in a knownnon-proxy website's content, wherein the patterns are characterized aschecksums; in response to finding a similar pattern between therequested website and the known non-proxy website, comparing therequested website's identifier with an identifier of the known non-proxywebsite; and in response to finding a mismatch between the two websiteidentifiers, categorizing at least a portion of the requested website'sidentifier as a suspected proxy website identifier.

In one aspect, a method of identifying a proxy website that is disclosedherein includes intercepting a website request; analyzing websitecontent that is retrieved based on the website request, wherein theanalysis involves looking for patterns within the website content thatare similar to patterns found in a known non-proxy website's content; inresponse to finding a similar pattern between the requested website andthe known non-proxy website, comparing the requested website'sidentifier with an identifier of the known non-proxy website; and inresponse to finding a mismatch between the two website identifiers,blocking a requester that initiated the website request from interactingwith the requested website.

In one aspect, a method of identifying a proxy website that is disclosedherein includes intercepting a website request; analyzing websitecontent that is retrieved based on the website request, wherein theanalysis involves looking for patterns within the website content thatare similar to patterns found in a known non-proxy website's content; inresponse to finding a similar pattern between the requested website andthe known non-proxy website, comparing the requested website'sidentifier with an identifier of the known non-proxy website; inresponse to finding a mismatch between the two website identifiers,analyzing the requested website content for patterns matching a knownproxy website; and blocking a requester that initiated the websiterequest from interacting with the requested website.

In one aspect, a method of identifying and categorizing proxy websitesthat is disclosed herein includes crawling the web to identify a targetwebsite; analyzing website content associated with the target website,wherein the analysis involves looking for patterns within the websitecontent that are similar to patterns found in a known non-proxywebsite's content; in response to finding a similar pattern between therequested website and the known non-proxy website, comparing therequested website's identifier with an identifier of the known non-proxywebsite; and in response to finding a mismatch between the two websiteidentifiers, categorizing at least a portion of the requested website'sidentifier as a suspected proxy website identifier and storing the atleast a portion of the requested website's identifier in a database.

In one aspect, a method of identifying a proxy website that is disclosedherein includes analyzing website content that is retrieved based on awebsite request, wherein the analysis involves looking for patternswithin the website content that are similar to patterns found in a knownproxy website's content, wherein the patterns are characterized aschecksums; and in response to finding a similar checksum between aportion of the requested website and a portion of the known proxywebsite, determining that portion of the requested website assuspicious.

In one aspect, a method and computer program product that is disclosedherein includes intercepting a universal resource locator (URL) requestfrom a client computing facility; interpreting terms in the URL toidentify that the URL was produced by a search engine in response to asearch; and interpreting the terms in the URL to identify that thesearch was directed towards locating a blocked category of website. Thecategory of blocked website may be a proxy site. The category of blockedwebsite may be an adult site category. The category of blocked websitemay be a blocked category. The category of blocked website may be anallowed category. The category of blocked website may be a safecategory. The category of blocked website may be a suspicious category.The category of blocked website may be a gaming category. The categoryof blocked website may be a social networking category. The category ofblocked website may be a job search category. The category of blockedwebsite may be an ecommerce category.

In one aspect, a method that is disclosed herein includes intercepting auniversal resource locator (URL) request from a client computingfacility; interpreting characters in the URL to identify that the URLwas produced by a search engine in response to a search; andinterpreting the characters in the URL to identify that the search wasdirected towards locating a blocked category of website.

In one aspect, a method that is disclosed herein includes intercepting auniversal resource locator (URL) request from a client computingfacility; interpreting terms in the URL to identify that the URL wasproduced by a search engine in response to a search; and interpretingthe terms in the URL to identify that the search was directed towardslocating a blocked website.

In one aspect, a method of blocking proxy website interactions that isdisclosed herein includes intercepting a universal resource locator(URL) request from a client computing facility; analyzing the charactersthat comprise the URL; and in response to a finding that the URL wasproduced by a search engine software program and directed to a searchrequest for a proxy site, blocking access to search results based on theURL. The step of analyzing the characters that may include the URLinvolves detecting keywords in the URL and comparing the keywords to adatabase of suspicious keywords to find a match. The step of analyzingthe characters that may include the URL involves detecting strings ofcharacters that match a string of characters typical of a search engine.The step of analyzing the characters that may include the URL involvesdetecting strings of characters that match a string of characterstypical of a proxy website identification search. The step of analyzingthe characters that may include the URL involves detecting regularexpressions that match a regular expression typical of a search engine.The regular expression may involve prefix matching. The regularexpression may involve suffix matching. The regular expression mayinvolve wildcard matching. The regular expression may involvesubstitution matching. The step of analyzing the characters that mayinclude the URL is performed on the client computing facility. The stepof analyzing the characters that may include the URL is performed on anetwork resource associated with the client computing facility.

In one aspect, a method of blocking proxy website interactions that isdisclosed herein includes intercepting a universal resource locator(URL) request from a client computing facility; analyzing the charactersthat comprise the URL; in response to a finding that the URL wasproduced by a search engine software program and directed to a searchrequest for a proxy site, allowing access to the search results based onthe URL; and identifying the access to the search results based on theURL to a systems administrator for further analysis.

In one aspect, a method and computer program product that is disclosedherein includes intercepting a website connection request; analyzing arequested website associated with the website connection request foroperator identification information; associating the operatorinformation with an entity that operates a known website; andcategorizing the requested website as a same category as the knownwebsite. The same category may be a proxy site category. The samecategory may be an adult site category. The same category may be ablocked category. The same category may be an allowed category. The samecategory may be a safe category. The same category may be a suspiciouscategory. The same category may be a gaming category. The same categorymay be a social networking category. The same category may be a jobsearch category. The same category may be an ecommerce category.

In one aspect, a method that is disclosed herein includes intercepting awebsite connection request; analyzing a website associated with thewebsite connection request for operator identification information; andassociating the operator information with an entity that operates aknown proxy website.

In one aspect, a method of blocking a proxy website interaction that isdisclosed herein includes intercepting a website connection request;analyzing a website associated with the website connection request forcustomer advertisement identification information; associating thecustomer advertisement identification information with an entity thatoperates a known proxy website; and blocking the website connectionrequest.

In one aspect, a method of identifying a proxy website that is disclosedherein includes intercepting a website connection request; analyzing awebsite associated with the website connection request for customeradvertisement identification information; associating the customeradvertisement identification information with an entity that operates aknown proxy website; and identifying the website as a proxy website.

In one aspect, a method that is disclosed herein includes identifying anadvertisement identifier as potentially being owned by a proxy siteoperator; analyzing a website for the presence of the advertisementidentifier; in response to identifying the advertisement identifier asassociated with the website, inferring that the website is a proxy site.

In one aspect, a method of identifying a proxy website that is disclosedherein includes intercepting a website connection request; analyzing awebsite associated with the website connection request for customeradvertisement identification information; associating the customeradvertisement identification information with an entity that operates aknown proxy website; and identifying the website as a suspected proxywebsite.

In one aspect, a method of identifying a proxy website that is disclosedherein includes intercepting a website connection request; analyzing awebsite associated with the website connection request for customeradvertisement identification information; associating the customeradvertisement identification information with an entity that operates aknown proxy website; analyzing the website for suspicious contentindicative of a potential proxy site; and in response to theidentification of the entity that operates a known proxy site and anidentification of the suspicious content, identifying the website as aproxy website.

In one aspect, a method of identifying an operator of a website that isdisclosed herein includes analyzing a plurality of websites for customeradvertisement identification information; identifying customeradvertisement identification information for each of the plurality ofwebsites; and grouping into subsets of the plurality of websites bycommon customer advertisement identification information. The method ofidentifying an operator of a website may include The particular type ofwebsite may be a proxy website. The particular type of website may be awebsite known for producing malware. The particular type of website maybe an adult website. The particular type of website may be a gamingwebsite. The particular type of website may be a social networkingwebsite.

These and other systems, methods, objects, features, and advantages ofthe present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art fromthe following detailed description of the preferred embodiment and thedrawings. All documents mentioned herein are hereby incorporated intheir entirety by reference.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The invention and the following detailed description of certainembodiments thereof may be understood by reference to the followingfigures:

FIG. 1 depicts a block diagram of a threat management facility providingprotection to an enterprise against a plurality of threats.

FIG. 2 depicts a method for enforcing a policy that prohibitscommunications from a proxy server.

FIG. 3 depicts a method of detecting proxies.

FIG. 4 depicts a method of detecting proxies.

FIG. 5 depicts a method of detecting proxies and suspected phishingsites.

FIG. 6 depicts a method of selectively blocking access to a searchengine.

While the invention has been described in connection with certainpreferred embodiments, other embodiments would be understood by one ofordinary skill in the art and are encompassed herein.

All documents referenced herein are hereby incorporated by reference.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 depicts a block diagram of a threat management facility providingprotection to an enterprise against a plurality of threats. An aspect ofthe present invention relates to corporate policy management and theirimplementation through a unified threat management facility 100. As willbe explained in more detail below, a threat management facility 100 isused to protect computer assets from many threats, both computergenerated threats and user generated threats. The threat managementfacility 100 is multi-dimensional in that it is designed to protectcorporate assets from a variety of threats and it is adapted to learnabout threats in one dimension (e.g. worm detection) and apply theknowledge in another dimension (e.g. spam detection). Corporate policymanagement is one of the dimensions for which the threat managementfacility can control. The corporation may institute a policy thatprevents certain people (e.g. employees, groups of employees, types ofemployees, guest of the corporation, etc.) from accessing certain typesof computer programs. For example, the corporation may elect to preventits accounting department from using a particular version of an instantmessaging service or all such services. In this example, the policymanagement facility 112 may be used to update the policies of allcorporate computing assets with a proper policy control facility or itmay update a select few. By using the threat management facility 100 tofacilitate the setting, updating and control of such policies thecorporation only needs to be concerned with keeping the threatmanagement facility 100 up to date on such policies. The threatmanagement facility 100 can take care of updating all of the othercorporate computing assets.

It should be understood that the threat management facility 100 mayprovide multiple services and policy management may be offered as one ofthe services. We will now turn to a description of the threat managementsystem 100

Over recent years, malware has become a major problem across theinternet 154. From both technical and user perspectives thecategorization of a specific threat type, such as whether it is a virus,worm, spam, phishing exploration, spyware, adware, or the like, isbecoming reduced in significance. The threat, no matter how it'scategorized, may need to be stopped at all points of the enterprisefacility 102, including laptop, desktop, server facility 142, gateway,and the like. Similarly, there may be less and less benefit to the userin having different solutions for known and unknown threats. As such, aconsolidated threat management facility 100 may need to be applied tothe same set of technologies and capabilities for all threats. Thethreat management facility 100 may provide a single agent on thedesktop, and a single scan of any suspect file. This approach mayeliminate the inevitable overlaps and gaps in protection caused bytreating viruses and spyware as separate problems, while simultaneouslysimplifying administration and minimizing desktop load. As the numberand range of types of threats has increased, so may have the level ofconnectivity available to all IT users. This may have lead to a rapidincrease in the speed at which threats may move. Today, an unprotectedPC connected to the internet 154 may be infected quickly, say within 10minutes, which may require acceleration for the delivery of threatprotection. Where once, monthly updates may have been sufficient, thethreat management facility 100 may automatically and seamlessly updateits product set against spam and virus threats quickly, for instance,every five minutes, every minute, continuously, or the like. Analysisand testing may be increasingly automated, and also may be performedmore frequently; for instance, it may be completed in 15 minutes, andmay do so without compromising quality. The threat management facility100 may also extend techniques that may have been developed for virusand malware protection, and provide them to enterprise facility 102network administrators to better control their environments. In additionto stopping malicious code, the threat management facility 100 mayprovide policy management that may be able to control legitimateapplications, such as VoIP, instant messaging, peer-to-peerfile-sharing, and the like, that may undermine productivity and networkperformance within the enterprise facility 102.

The threat management facility 100 may provide an enterprise facility102 protection from computer-based malware, including viruses, spyware,adware, Trojans, intrusion, spam, policy abuse, uncontrolled access, andthe like, where the enterprise facility 102 may be any entity with anetworked computer-based infrastructure. In an embodiment, FIG. 1 maydepict a block diagram of the threat management facility providingprotection to an enterprise against a plurality of threats. Theenterprise facility 102 may be corporate, commercial, educational,governmental, or the like, and the enterprise facility's 102 computernetwork may be distributed amongst a plurality of facilities, and in aplurality of geographical locations. The threat management facility 100may include a plurality of functions, such as security managementfacility 122, policy management facility 112, update facility 120,definitions facility 114, network access rules facility 124, remedialaction facility 128, detection techniques facility 130, testing facility118, threat research facility 132, and the like. In embodiments, thethreat protection provided by the threat management facility 100 mayextend beyond the network boundaries of the enterprise facility 102 toinclude enterprise facility 102 client facility's 144 that have movedinto network connectivity not directly associated or controlled by theenterprise facility 102. Threats to enterprise facility 102 clientfacilities 144 may come from a plurality of sources, such as fromnetwork threats 104, physical proximity threats 110, secondary locationthreats 108, and the like. In embodiments, the threat managementfacility 100 may provide an enterprise facility 102 protection from aplurality of threats to multiplatform computer resources in a pluralityof locations and network configurations, with an integrated systemapproach.

In embodiments, the threat management facility 100 may be provided as astand-alone solution. In other embodiments, the threat managementfacility 100 may be integrated into a third-party product. Anapplication programming interface (e.g. a source code interface) may beprovided such that the threat management facility 100 may be integrated.For instance, the threat management facility 100 may be stand-alone inthat it provides direct threat protection to an enterprise or computerresource, where protection is subscribed to directly with the threatmanagement facility 100. Alternatively, the threat management facilitymay offer protection indirectly, through a third-party product, where anenterprise may subscribe to services through the third-party product,and threat protection to the enterprise may be provided by the threatmanagement facility 100 through the third-party product.

The security management facility 122 may include a plurality of elementsthat provide protection from malware to enterprise facility 102 computerresources, including endpoint security and control, email security andcontrol, web security and control, reputation-based filtering, controlof unauthorized users, control of guest and non-compliant computers, andthe like. The security management facility 122 may be a softwareapplication that may provide malicious code and malicious applicationprotection to a client facility 144 computing resource. The securitymanagement facility 122 may have the ability to scan the client facility144 files for malicious code, remove or quarantine certain applicationsand files, prevent certain actions, perform remedial actions and performother security measures. In embodiments, scanning the client facility144 may include scanning some or all of the files stored to the clientfacility 144 on a periodic basis, may scan applications once theapplication has been requested to execute, may scan files as the filesare transmitted to or from the client facility 144, or the like. Thescanning of the applications and files may be to detect known maliciouscode or known unwanted applications. In an embodiment, new maliciouscode and unwanted applications may be continually developed anddistributed, and updates to the known code database may be provided on aperiodic basis, on a demand basis, on an alert basis, or the like.

In an embodiment, the security management facility 122 may provide foremail security and control, where security management may help toeliminate spam, viruses, spyware and phishing, control of email content,and the like. The security management facilities 122 email security andcontrol may protect against inbound and outbound threats, protect emailinfrastructure, prevent data leakage, provide spam filtering, and thelike. In an embodiment, security management facility 122 may provide forweb security and control, where security management may help to detector block viruses, spyware, malware, unwanted applications, help controlweb browsing, and the like, which may provide comprehensive web accesscontrol enabling safe, productive web browsing. Web security and controlmay provide internet use policies, reporting on suspect devices,security and content filtering, active monitoring of network traffic,URL filtering, and the like. In an embodiment, the security managementfacility 122 may provide for network access control, which may providecontrol over network connections. Network control may stop unauthorized,guest, or non-compliant systems from accessing networks, and may controlnetwork traffic that may not be bypassed from the client level. Inaddition, network access control may control access to virtual privatenetworks (VPN), where VPNs may be a communications network tunneledthrough another network, establishing a logical connection acting as avirtual network. In embodiments, a VPN may be treated in the same manneras a physical network.

In an embodiment, the security management facility 122 may provide forhost intrusion prevention through behavioral based protection, which mayguard against unknown threats by analyzing behavior before software codeexecutes. Behavioral based protection may monitor code when it runs andintervene if the code is deemed to be suspicious or malicious.Advantages of behavioral based protection over runtime protection mayinclude code being prevented from running, whereas runtime protectionmay only interrupt code that has already partly executed; behavioralprotection may identify malicious code at the gateway or on the fileservers and deletes it before reaching end-point computers and the like.

In an embodiment, the security management facility 122 may provide forreputation filtering, which may target or identify sources of knownmalware. For instance, reputation filtering may include lists of URLs ofknown sources of malware or known suspicious IP addresses, or domains,say for spam, that when detected may invoke an action by the threatmanagement facility 100, such as dropping them immediately. By droppingthe source before any interaction can initiate, potential threat sourcesmay be thwarted before any exchange of data can be made.

In embodiments, information may be sent from the enterprise back to athird party, a vendor, or the like, which may lead to improvedperformance of the threat management facility 100. For example, thetypes, times, and number of virus interactions that a client experiencesmay provide useful information for the preventions of future virusthreats. This type of feedback may be useful for any aspect of threatdetection. Feedback of information may also be associated with behaviorsof individuals within the enterprise, such as being associated with mostcommon violations of policy, network access, unauthorized applicationloading, unauthorized external device use, and the like. In embodiments,this type of information feedback may enable the evaluation or profilingof client actions that are violations of policy that may provide apredictive model for the improvement of enterprise policies.

In an embodiment, the security management facility 122 may provide forthe overall security of the enterprise facility 102 network or set ofenterprise facility 102 networks, may provide updates of malicious codeinformation to the enterprise facility 102 network, and associatedclient facilities 144. The updates may be a planned update, an update inreaction to a threat notice, an update in reaction to a request for anupdate, an update based on a search of known malicious code information,or the like. The administration facility 134 may provide control overthe security management facility 122 when updates are performed. Theupdates may be automatically transmitted without an administrationfacility's 134 direct control, manually transmitted by theadministration facility 134, or the like. The security managementfacility 122 may include the management of receiving malicious codedescriptions from a provider, distribution of malicious codedescriptions to enterprise facility 102 networks, distribution ofmalicious code descriptions to client facilities 144, or the like. In anembodiment, the management of malicious code information may be providedto the enterprise facility's 102 network, where the enterprisefacility's 102 network may provide the malicious code informationthrough the enterprise facility's 102 network distribution system.

The threat management facility 100 may provide policy managementfacility 112 that may be able to block non-malicious applications, suchas VoIP 164, instant messaging 162, peer-to-peer file-sharing, and thelike, that may undermine productivity and network performance within theenterprise facility 102. The policy management facility 112 may be a setof rules or policies that may indicate enterprise facility 102 accesspermissions for the client facility 144, such as access permissionsassociated with the network, applications, external computer devices,and the like. The policy management facility 112 may include a database,a text file, a combination of databases and text files, or the like. Inan embodiment, a policy database may be a block list, a black list, anallowed list, a white list, or the like that may provide a list ofenterprise facility 102external network locations/applications that mayor may not be accessed by the client facility 144. The policy managementfacility 112 may include rules that may be interpreted with respect toan enterprise facility 102 network access request to determine if therequest should be allowed. The rules may provide a generic rule for thetype of access that may be granted; the rules may be related to thepolicies of an enterprise facility 102 for access rights for theenterprise facility's 102 client facility 144. For example, there may bea rule that does not permit access to sporting websites. When a websiteis requested by the client facility 144, a security facility may accessthe rules within a policy facility to determine if the requested accessis related to a sporting website. In an embodiment, the securityfacility may analyze the requested website to determine if the websitematches with any of the policy facility rules.

The policy management facility 112 may be similar to the securitymanagement facility 122 but with the distribution of enterprise facility102 wide access rules and policies that may maintain control of theaccess of client facility 144 to enterprise facility 102 networkresources. The policies may be defined for application type, subset ofapplication capabilities, organization hierarchy, computer facilitytype, user type, network location, time of day, connection type, or thelike. Policies may be maintained by the administration facility 134,through the threat management facility 100, in association with a thirdparty, or the like. For example, a policy may restrict IM 162 activityto only support personnel for communicating with customers. This mayallow communication for departments requiring access, but may maintainthe network bandwidth for other activities by restricting the use of IM162 to only the personnel that need access to IM 162 in support of theenterprise facility 102. In an embodiment, the policy managementfacility 112 may be a standalone application, may be part of the policymanagement facility 112, network server facility 142, may be part of theenterprise facility 102 network, may be part of the client facility 144,or the like.

In embodiments, the threat management facility 100 may provideconfiguration management, which may be similar to policy management, butmay specifically examine the configuration set of applications,operating systems, hardware, and the like, and managing changes to theirconfigurations. Assessment of a configuration may be made against astandard configuration policy, detection of configuration changes,remediation of improper configuration, application of newconfigurations, and the like. An enterprise may keep a set of standardconfiguration rules and policies which may represent the desired stateof the device. For example, a client firewall may be running andinstalled, but in the disabled state, where remediation may be to enablethe firewall. In another example, the enterprise may set a rule thatdisallows the use of USB disks, and sends a configuration change to allclients, which turns off USB drive access via a registry.

In embodiments, the threat management facility 100 may also provide forthe removal of applications that may interfere with the operation of thethreat management facility 100, such as competitor products that mayalso be attempting similar threat management functions. The removal ofsuch products may be initiated automatically whenever such products aredetected. In the case where such applications are services are providedindirectly through a third-party product, the application may besuspended until action is taken to remove or disable the third-partyproduct's protection facility.

Threat management against a sometimes quickly evolving malwareenvironment may require timely updates, and the update managementfacility 120 may be provided by the threat management facility 100. Inaddition, a policy management facility 112 may also require updatemanagement (e.g. as provided by the update facility 120 hereindescribed), as the enterprise facility 102 requirements for policieschange enterprise facility 102, client facility 144, server facility142enterprise facility 102. The update management for the securityfacility 122 and policy management facility 112 may be provided directlyby the threat management facility 100, such as by a hosted system or inconjunction with the administration facility 134. In embodiments, thethreat management facility 100 may provide for patch management, where apatch may be an update to an operating system, an application, a systemtool, or the like, where one of the reasons for the patch is to reducevulnerability to threats.

In embodiments, the security facility 122 and policy management facility112 may push information to the enterprise facility 102 network and/orclient facility 144, the enterprise facility 102 network and/or clientfacility 144 may pull information from the security facility 122 andpolicy management facility 112 network server facilities 142, there maybe a combination of pushing and pulling of information between thesecurity facility 122 and the policy management facility 112 networkservers 142, enterprise facility 102 network, and client facilities 144,or the like. For example, the enterprise facility 102 network and/orclient facility 144 may pull information from the security facility 122and policy management facility 112 network server facility 142 mayrequest the information using the security facility 122 and policymanagement facility 112 update module; the request may be based on acertain time period, by a certain time, by a date, on demand, or thelike. In another example, the security facility 122 and policymanagement facility 112 network servers 142 may push the information tothe enterprise facility's 102 network and/or client facility 144 byproviding notification that there are updates available for download andthen transmitting the information. The combination of the securitymanagement 122 network server facility 142 and security update modulemay function substantially the same as the policy management facility112 network server and policy update module by providing information tothe enterprise facility 102 network and the client facility 144 in apush or pull method. In an embodiment, the policy management facility112 and the security facility 122 management update modules may work inconcert to provide all the needed information to the enterprisefacility's 102 network and/or client facility 144 for control ofapplication execution. In an embodiment, the policy update module andsecurity update module may be combined into a single update module.

As threats are identified and characterized, the threat managementfacility 100 may create definition updates that may be used to allow thethreat management facility 100 to detect and remediate the latestmalicious software, unwanted applications, configuration and policychanges, and the like. The threat definition facility 114 may containthreat identification updates, also referred to as definition files. Adefinition file may be a virus identity file that may includedefinitions of known or potential malicious code. The IDE definitionfiles may provide information that may identify malicious code withinfiles, applications, or the like. The definition files may be accessedby security management facility 122 when scanning files or applicationswithin the client facility 144 for the determination of malicious codethat may be within the file or application. The definition files maycontain a number of commands, definitions, or instructions, to be parsedand acted upon, or the like. In embodiments, the client facility 144 maybe updated with new definition files periodically to provide the clientfacility 144 with the most recent malicious code definitions; theupdating may be performed on a set time period, may be updated on demandfrom the client facility 144, may be updated on demand from the network,may be updated on a received malicious code alert, or the like. In anembodiment, the client facility 144 may request an update to thedefinition files from an update facility 120 within the network, mayrequest updated definition files from a computing facility external tothe network, updated definition files may be provided to the clientfacility 114 from within the network, definition files may be providedto the client facility 144 from an external computing facility from anexternal network, or the like.

In an embodiment, a definition management facility 114 may provide forthe timely updates of definition files information to the network,client facilities 144, and the like. New and altered malicious code andmalicious applications may be continually created and distributed tonetworks worldwide. The definition files that maintain the definitionsof the malicious code and malicious application information for theprotection of the networks and client facilities 144 may need continualupdating to provide continual defense of the network and client facility144 from the malicious code and malicious applications. The definitionfiles management may provide for automatic and manual methods ofupdating the definition files. In embodiments, the network may receivedefinition files and distribute the definition files to the networkclient facilities 144, the client facilities 144 may receive thedefinition files directly, or the network and client facilities 144 mayboth receive the definition files, or the like. In an embodiment, thedefinition files may be updated on a fixed periodic basis, on demand bythe network and/or the client facility 144, as a result of an alert of anew malicious code or malicious application, or the like. In anembodiment, the definition files may be released as a supplemental fileto an existing definition files to provide for rapid updating of thedefinition files.

In a similar manner, the security management facility 122 may be used toscan an outgoing file and verify that the outgoing file is permitted tobe transmitted per the enterprise facility 102 rules and policies. Bychecking outgoing files, the security management facility 122 may beable discover malicious code infected files that were not detected asincoming files as a result of the client facility 144 having beenupdated with either new definition files or policy management facility112 information. The definition files may discover the malicious codeinfected file by having received updates of developing malicious codefrom the administration facility 134, updates from a definition filesprovider, or the like. The policy management facility 112 may discoverthe malicious code infected file by having received new updates from theadministration facility 134, from a rules provider, or the like.

The threat management facility 100 may provide for a way to controlaccess to the enterprise facility 102 networks. For instance, theenterprise facility 102 may want to restrict access to certainapplications, networks, files, printers, servers, databases, or thelike. In addition, the enterprise facility 102 may want to restrict useraccess under certain conditions, such as the user's location, usagehistory, need to know, job position, connection type, time of day,method of authentication, client-system configuration, or the like.Network access rules may be developed by the enterprise facility 102, orpre-packaged by a supplier, and managed by the threat managementfacility 100 in conjunction with the administration facility 134.Network access rules and control may be responsible for determining if aclient facility 144 application should be granted access to a requestednetwork location. The network location may be on the same network as thefacility or may be on another network. In an embodiment, the networkaccess control may verify access rights for client facilities 144 fromwithin the network or may verify access rights of computer facilitiesfrom external networks. When network access for a client facility 144 isdenied, the network access control may send an information file to theclient facility 144, the information file may contain data or commandsthat may provide instructions for the remedial action facility 128. Theinformation sent by the network access facility 124 control may be adata file. The data file may contain a number of commands, definitions,instructions, or commands to be parsed and acted upon through theremedial action facility 128, or the like. The information sent by thenetwork access facility 124 control may be a command or command filethat the remedial action facility 128 may access and take action upon.

In an embodiment, the network access rules 124 may provide aninformation store to be accessed by the network access control. Thenetwork access rules facility 124 may include databases such as a blocklist, a black list, an allowed list, a white list, an unacceptablenetwork site database, an acceptable network site database, a networksite reputation database, or the like of network access locations thatmay or may not be accessed by the client facility 144. Additionally, thenetwork access rules facility 124 may incorporate rule evaluation; therule evaluation may parse network access requests and apply the parsedinformation to network access rules. The network access rule facility124 may have a generic set of rules that may be in support of anenterprise facility's 102 network access policies, such as denyingaccess to certain types of websites 158, controlling instant messenger162 accesses, or the like. Rule evaluation may include regularexpression rule evaluation, or other rule evaluation method forinterpreting the network access request and comparing the interpretationto the established rules for network access. In an embodiment, thenetwork access rules facility 124 may receive a rules evaluation requestfrom the network access control and may return the rules evaluation tothe network access control.

Similar to the threat definitions facility 114, the network access rulefacility 124 may provide updated rules and policies to the networkaccess rules facility 124. The network access rules facility 124 may bemaintained by the network administration facility 134 using the networkaccess rules facility 124 management. In an embodiment, the networkadministration facility 134 may be able to maintain a set of accessrules manually by adding rules, changing rules, deleting rules, or thelike. Additionally, the administration facility 134 may be able toretrieve predefined rule sets from a provider that may provide a set ofrules to be applied to an entire enterprise facility 102. The networkadministration facility 134 may be able to modify the predefined rulesas needed for a particular enterprise facility 102 using the networkaccess rules management facility 124.

When a threat or policy violation is detected by the threat managementfacility 100, the threat management facility 100 may provide for aremedial action facility 128. Remedial action may take a plurality offorms, such as terminating or modifying an ongoing process orinteraction, sending a warning to a client or administration facility134 of an ongoing process or interaction, executing a program orapplication to remediate against a threat or violation, recordinteractions for subsequent evaluation, or the like. Remedial action maybe associated with an application that responds to information that aclient facility 144 network access request has been denied. In anembodiment, when the data file is received, remedial action may parsethe data file, interpret the various aspects of the data file, and acton the parsed data file information to determine actions to be taken onan application requesting access to a denied network location. In anembodiment, when the data file is received, remedial action may accessthe threat definitions to parse the data file and determine an action tobe taken on an application requesting access to a denied networklocation. In an embodiment, the information received from the facilitymay be a command or a command file. The remedial action facility maycarry out any commands that are received or parsed from a data file fromthe facility without performing any interpretation of the commands. Inan embodiment, the remedial action facility may interact with thereceived information and may perform various actions on a clientrequesting access to a denied network location. The action may be one ormore of continuing to block all requests to a denied network location, amalicious code scan on the application, a malicious code scan on theclient facility 144, quarantine of the application, terminating theapplication, isolation of the application, isolation of the clientfacility 144 to a location within the network that restricts networkaccess, blocking a network access port from a client facility 144,reporting the application to a administration facility 134, or the like.

Remedial action may be provided as a result of a detection of a threator violation. The detection techniques facility 130 may includemonitoring the enterprise facility 102 network or end-point devices,such as by monitoring streaming data through the gateway, across thenetwork, through routers and hubs, and the like. The detectiontechniques facility 130 may include monitoring activity and stored fileson computing facilities, such as on server facilities 142, desktopcomputers, laptop computers, other mobile computing devices, and thelike. Detection techniques, such as scanning a computer's stored files,may provide the capability of checking files for stored threats, eitherin the active or passive state. Detection techniques, such as streamingfile management, may provide the capability of checking files receivedat the network, gateway facility, client facility 144, and the like.This may provide the capability of not allowing a streaming file orportions of the streaming file containing malicious code from enteringthe client facility 144, gateway facility, or network. In an embodiment,the streaming file may be broken into blocks of information, and aplurality of virus identities may be used to check each of the blocks ofinformation for malicious code. In an embodiment, any blocks that arenot determined to be clear of malicious code may not be delivered to theclient facility 144, gateway facility, or network.

Verifying that the threat management facility 100 is detecting threatsand violations to established policy, may require the ability to testthe system, either at the system level or for a particular computingcomponent. The testing facility 118 may allow the administrationfacility 134 to coordinate the testing of the security configurations ofclient facility 144 computing facilities on a network. Theadministration facility 134 may be able to send test files to a set ofclient facility 144 computing facilities to test the ability of theclient facility 144 to determine acceptability of the test file. Afterthe test file has been transmitted, a recording facility may record theactions taken by the client facility 144 in reaction to the test file.The recording facility may aggregate the testing information from theclient facility 144 and report the testing information to theadministration facility 134. The administration facility 134 may be ableto determine the level of preparedness of the client facility 144computing facilities by the reported information. Remedial action may betaken for any of the client facility 144 computing facilities asdetermined by the administration facility 134; remedial action may betaken by the administration facility 134 or by the user of the clientfacility 144.

The threat research facility 132 may provide a continuously ongoingeffort to maintain the threat protection capabilities of the threatmanagement facility 100 in light of continuous generation of new orevolved forms of malware. Threat research may include researchers andanalysts working on known and emerging malware, such as viruses,rootkits a spyware, as well as other computer threats such as phishing,spam, scams, and the like. In embodiments, through threat research, thethreat management facility 100 may be able to provide swift, globalresponses to the latest threats.

The threat management facility 100 may provide threat protection to theenterprise facility 102, where the enterprise facility 102 may include aplurality of networked components, such as client facility 144, serverfacility 142, DNS server facility 210, administration facility 134,firewall 138, gateway, hubs 148, routers, threat management appliance140, desktop users, mobile users, and the like. In embodiments, it maybe the end-point computer security facility 152, located on a computer'sdesktop, which may provide threat protection to a user, and associatedenterprise facility 102. In embodiments, the term end-point may refer toa computer system that may source data, receive data, evaluate data,buffer data, or the like, such as a user's desktop computer as anend-point computer, a firewall as a data evaluation end-point computersystem, a laptop as a mobile end-point computer, a PDA as a hand-heldend-point computer. In embodiments, end-point may refer to a source ordestination for data, including such components where the destination ischaracterized by an evaluation point for data, and where the data may besent to a subsequent destination after evaluation. The end-pointcomputer security facility 152 may be an application loaded onto thecomputer platform or computer support component, where the applicationmay accommodate the plurality of computer platforms and/or functionalrequirements of the component. For instance, a client facility 144computer may be one of a plurality of computer platforms, such asWindows, Macintosh, Linux, and the like, where the end-point computersecurity facility 152 may be adapted to the specific platform, whilemaintaining a uniform product and product services across platforms.Additionally, components may have different functions to serve withinthe enterprise facility's 102 networked computer-based infrastructure.For instance, computer support components provided as hubs 148, routers,server facility 142, DNS server facility 210, firewalls 138, and thelike, may require unique security application software to protect theirportion of the system infrastructure, while providing an element in anintegrated threat management system that extends out beyond the threatmanagement facility 100 to incorporate all computer resources under itsprotection.

The enterprise facility 102 may include a plurality of client facility144 computing platforms on which the end-point computer securityfacility 152 is adapted. A client facility 144 computing platform may bea computer system that is able to access a service on another computer,such as a server facility 142, via a network. This client facility 144server facility 142 model may apply to a plurality of networkedapplications, such as a client facility 144 connecting to an enterprisefacility 102 application server facility 142, a web browser clientfacility 144 connecting to a web server facility 142, an e-mail clientfacility 144 retrieving e-mail from an internet 154 service provider'smail storage servers 142, and the like. In embodiments, traditionallarge client facility 144 applications may be switched to websites,which may increase the browser's role as a client facility 144. Clients144 may be classified as a function of the extent to which they performtheir own processing. For instance, client facilities 144 are sometimesclassified as a fat client facility 144 or thin client facility 144. Thefat client facility 144, also known as a thick client facility 144 orrich client facility 144, may be a client facility 144 that performs thebulk of data processing operations itself, and does not necessarily relyon the server facility 142. The fat client facility 144 may be mostcommon in the form of a personal computer, where the personal computermay operate independent of any server facility 142. Programmingenvironments for fat clients 144 may include CURI, Delphi, Droplets,Java, win32, X11, and the like. Thin clients 144 may offer minimalprocessing capabilities, for instance, the thin client facility 144 mayprimarily provide a graphical user interface provided by an applicationserver facility 142, which may perform the bulk of any required dataprocessing. Programming environments for thin clients 144 may includeJavaScript/AJAX, ASP, JSP, Ruby on Rails, Python's Django, PHP, and thelike. The client facility 144 may also be a mix of the two, such asprocessing data locally, but relying on a server facility 142 for datastorage. As a result, this hybrid client facility 144 may providebenefits from both the fat client facility 144 type, such as multimediasupport and high performance, and the thin client facility 144 type,such as high manageability and flexibility. In embodiments, the threatmanagement facility 100, and associated end-point computer securityfacility 152, may provide seamless threat protection to the plurality ofclients 144, and client facility 144 types, across the enterprisefacility 102.

The enterprise facility 102 may include a plurality of server facility142, such as application servers 142, communications servers 142, fileservers 142, database servers 142, proxy servers 142, mail servers 142,fax servers 142, game servers 142, web servers 142, and the like. Aserver facility 142, which may also be referred to as a server facility142 application, server facility 142 operating system, server facility142 computer, or the like, may be an application program or operatingsystem that accepts client facility 144 connections in order to servicerequests from clients 144. The server facility 142 application may runon the same computer as the client facility 144 using it, or the serverfacility 142 and the client facility 144 may be running on differentcomputers and communicating across the network. Server facility 142applications may be divided among server facility 142 computers, withthe dividing depending upon the workload. For instance, under light loadconditions all server facility 142 applications may run on a singlecomputer and under heavy load conditions a single server facility 142application may run on multiple computers. In embodiments, the threatmanagement facility 100 may provide threat protection to serverfacilities 142 within the enterprise facility 102 as load conditions andapplication changes are made.

A server facility 142 may also be an appliance facility 140, where theappliance facility 140 provides specific services onto the network.Though the appliance facility 140 is a server facility 142 computer,that may be loaded with a server facility 142 operating system andserver facility 142 application, the enterprise facility 102 user maynot need to configure it, as the configuration may have been performedby a third party. In an embodiment, an enterprise facility 102 appliancemay be a server facility 142 appliance that has been configured andadapted for use with the threat management facility 100, and locatedwithin the facilities of the enterprise facility 102. The enterprisefacility's 102 threat management appliance may enable the enterprisefacility 102 to administer an on-site local managed threat protectionconfiguration, where the administration facility 134 may access thethreat resources through an interface, such as a web portal. In analternate embodiment, the enterprise facility 102 may be managedremotely from a third party, vendor, or the like, without an appliancefacility 140 located within the enterprise facility 102. In thisinstance, the appliance functionality may be a shared hardware productbetween pluralities of enterprises 102. In embodiments, the appliancefacility 140 may be located at the enterprise facility 102, where theenterprise facility 102 maintains a degree of control. In embodiments, ahosted service may be provided, where the appliance 140 may still be anon-site black box to the enterprise facility 102, physically placedthere because of infrastructure requirements, but managed by a thirdparty, vendor, or the like.

Simple server facility 142 appliances may also be utilized across theenterprise facility's 102 network infrastructure, such as switches,routers, wireless routers, hubs 148, gateways, print servers 142, netmodems, and the like. These simple server facility appliances may notrequire configuration by the enterprise facility 102, but may requireprotection from threats via an end-point computer security facility 152.These appliances may provide interconnection services within theenterprise facility 102 network, and therefore may advance the spread ofa threat if not properly protected.

One way for a client facility 144 to be protected from threats fromwithin the enterprise facility 102 network may be a personal firewall. Apersonal firewall may be an application that controls network traffic toand from a client, permitting or denying communications based on asecurity policy. Personal firewalls may be designed for use byend-users, which may result in protection for only the computer on whichit's installed. Personal firewalls may be able to control networktraffic by providing prompts each time a connection is attempted andadapting security policy accordingly. Personal firewalls may alsoprovide some level of intrusion detection, which may allow the softwareto terminate or block connectivity where it suspects an intrusion isbeing attempted. Other features that may be provided by a personalfirewall may include alerts about outgoing connection attempts, controlof program access to networks, hiding the client from port scans by notresponding to unsolicited network traffic, monitoring of applicationsthat may be listening for incoming connections, monitoring andregulation of incoming and outgoing network traffic, prevention ofunwanted network traffic from installed applications, reportingapplications that make connection attempts, reporting destinationservers with which applications may be attempting communications, andthe like. In embodiments, the personal firewall may be provided by thethreat management facility 100.

Another important component that may be protected by an end-pointcomputer security facility 152 is a network firewall facility 138, whichmay be a hardware or software device that may be configured to permit,deny, or proxy data through a computer network that has different levelsof trust in its source of data. For instance, an internal enterprisefacility 102 network may have a high level of trust, because the sourceof all data has been sourced from within the enterprise facility 102. Anexample of a low level of trust is the Internet 154, because the sourceof data may be unknown. A zone with an intermediate trust level,situated between the Internet 154 and a trusted internal network, may bereferred to as a “perimeter network”. Since firewall facilities 138represent boundaries between threat levels, the end-point computersecurity facility 152 associated with the firewall facility 138 mayprovide resources that may control the flow of threats at thisenterprise facility 102 network entry point. Firewall facilities 138,and associated end-point computer security facility 152, may also beassociated with a network node that may be equipped for interfacingbetween networks that use different protocols. In embodiments, theend-point computer security facility 152 may provide threat protectionin a plurality of network infrastructure locations, such as at theenterprise facility 102 network entry point, i.e. the firewall facility138 or gateway; at the server facility 142; at distribution pointswithin the network, i.e. the routers and hubs 148; at the desktop ofclient facility 144 computers; and the like. In embodiments, the mosteffective location for threat detection may be at the user's computerdesktop end-point computer security facility 152.

The interface between the threat management facility 100 and theenterprise facility 102, and through the appliance facility 140 toembedded end-point computer security facilities, may include a set oftools that may be the same for all enterprise implementations, but alloweach enterprise to implement different controls. In embodiments, thesecontrols may include both automatic actions and managed actions.Automatic actions may include downloads of the end-point computersecurity facility 152 to components of the enterprise facility 102,downloads of updates to existing end-point computer security facilitiesof the enterprise facility 102, uploaded network interaction requestsfrom enterprise facility 102 components to the threat managementfacility 100, and the like. In embodiments, automatic interactionsbetween the enterprise facility 102 and the threat management facility100 may be configured by the threat management facility 100 and anadministration facility 134 in the enterprise facility 102. Theadministration facility 134 may configure policy rules that determineinteractions, such as developing rules for accessing applications, as inwho is authorized and when applications may be used; establishing rulesfor ethical behavior and activities; rules governing the use ofentertainment software such as games, or personal use software such asIM 162 and VoIP 164; rules for determining access to enterprise facility102 computing resources, including authentication, levels of access,risk assessment, and usage history tracking; rules for when an action isnot allowed, such as whether an action is completely deigned or justmodified in its execution; and the like. The administration facility 134may also establish license management, which in turn may furtherdetermine interactions associated with a licensed application. Inembodiments, interactions between the threat management facility 100 andthe enterprise facility 102 may provide threat protection to theenterprise facility 102 by managing the flow of network data into andout of the enterprise facility 102 through automatic actions that may beconfigured by the threat management facility 100 or the administrationfacility 134.

Client facilities 144 within the enterprise facility 102 may beconnected to the enterprise facility 102 network by way of wired networkfacilities 148 or wireless network facilities 150. Client facilities 144connected to the enterprise facility 102 network via a wired facility148 or wireless facility 150 may receive similar protection, as bothconnection types are ultimately connected to the same enterprisefacility 102 network, with the same end-point computer security facility152, and the same threat protected enterprise facility 102 environment.Mobile wireless facility 150 clients 144, because of their ability toconnect to any wireless 150 network access point, may connect to theinternet 154 outside the enterprise facility 102, and therefore outsidethe threat-protected environment of the enterprise facility 102. In thisinstance the mobile client facility 144, if not for the presence of theend-point computer security facility 152 may experience a malware attackor perform actions counter to enterprise facility 102 establishedpolicies. In addition, there may be a plurality of ways for the threatmanagement facility 100 to protect the out-of-enterprise facility 102mobile client facility 144 that has an embedded end-point computersecurity facility 152, such as by providing URL filtering in personalrouters, using a web appliance as a DNS proxy, or the like. Mobileclient facilities 144 that are components of the enterprise facility 102but temporarily outside connectivity with the enterprise facility 102network, may be provided with the same threat protection and policycontrol as client facilities 144 inside the enterprise facility 102. Inaddition, mobile client facilities 144 may receive the same interactionsto and from the threat management facility 100 as client facilities 144inside the enterprise facility 102, where mobile client facilities 144may be considered a virtual extension of the enterprise facility 102,receiving all the same services via their embedded end-point computersecurity facility 152.

Interactions between the threat management facility 100 and thecomponents of the enterprise facility 102, including mobile clientfacility 144 extensions of the enterprise facility 102, may ultimatelybe connected through the internet 154. Threat management facility 100downloads and upgrades to the enterprise facility 102 may be passed fromthe firewalled networks of the threat management facility 100 through tothe end-point computer security facility 152 equipped components of theenterprise facility 102. In turn the end-point computer securityfacility 152 components of the enterprise facility 102 may upload policyand access requests back across the internet 154 and through to thethreat management facility 100. The Internet 154 however, is also thepath through which threats may be transmitted from their source. Thesenetwork threats may include threats from a plurality of sources,including websites 158, e-mail 160, IM 162, VoIP 164, applicationsoftware, and the like. These threats may attempt to attack a mobileenterprise facility 102 client facility 144 equipped with an end-pointcomputer security facility 152, but in embodiments, as long as themobile client facility 144 is embedded with an end-point computersecurity facility 152, as described above, threats may have no bettersuccess than if the mobile client facility 144 where inside theenterprise facility 102.

However, if the mobile client facility 144 were to attempt to connectinto an unprotected connection point, such as at a secondary location108 that is not a part of the enterprise facility 102, the mobile clientfacility 144 may be required to request network interactions through thethreat management facility 100, where contacting the threat managementfacility 100 may be performed prior to any other network action. Inembodiments, the client facility's 144 end-point computer securityfacility 152 may manage actions in unprotected network environments suchas when the client facility 144 is in a secondary location 108 orconnecting wirelessly 150 to a non-enterprise facility 102 wirelessinternet 154 connection, where the end-point computer security facility152 may dictate what actions are allowed, blocked, modified, or thelike. For instance, if the client facility's 144 end-point computersecurity facility 152 is unable to establish a secured connection to thethreat management facility 100, the end-point computer security facility152 may inform the user of such, and recommend that the connection notbe made. In the instance when the user chooses to connect despite therecommendation, the end-point computer security facility 152 may performspecific actions during or after the unprotected connection is made,including running scans during the connection period, running scansafter the connection is terminated, storing interactions for subsequentthreat and policy evaluation, contacting the threat management facility100 upon first instance of a secured connection for further actions andor scanning restricting access to network and local resources, or thelike. In embodiments, the end-point computer security facility 152 mayperform specific actions to remediate possible threat incursions orpolicy violations during or after the unprotected connection.

The secondary location 108 may have no end-point computer securityfacilities 152 as a part of its computer components, such as itsfirewalls 138, servers 142, clients 144, hubs 148, wireless hubs 150,and the like. As a result, the computer components of the secondarylocation 108 may be open to threat attacks, and become potential sourcesof threats, as well as any mobile enterprise facility 102 clients 144that may be connected to the secondary location's 108 network. In thisinstance, these computer components may now unknowingly spread a threatto other components connected to the network.

Some threats may not come directly from the Internet 154, such as fromnon-enterprise facility 102 controlled mobile devices that arephysically brought into the enterprise facility 102 and connected to theenterprise facility 102 client facilities 144. The connection may bemade from direct connection with the enterprise facility's 102 clientfacility 144, such as through a USB port, or in physical proximity withthe enterprise facility's 102 client facility 144 such that a wirelessfacility 150 connection can be established, such as through a Bluetoothconnection. These physical proximity threats 110 may be another mobilecomputing device, a portable memory storage device, a mobilecommunications device, or the like, such as CDs and DVDs 170, memorystick 174, flash drive 174, external hard drive, cell phone 178, PDAs180, MP3 players, digital cameras, point-to-point devices, digitalpicture frames, digital pens, navigation devices, appliances, and thelike. A physical proximity threat 110 may have been previouslyinfiltrated by network threats while connected to an unprotected networkconnection outside the enterprise facility 102, and when connected tothe enterprise facility 102 client facility 144, pose a threat. Becauseof their mobile nature, physical proximity threats 110 may infiltratecomputing resources in any location, such as being physically broughtinto the enterprise facility 102 site, connected to an enterprisefacility 102 client facility 144 while that client facility 144 ismobile, plugged into an unprotected client facility 144 at a secondarylocation 108, and the like. A mobile device, once connected to anunprotected computer resource, may become a physical proximity threat110. In embodiments, the end-point computer security facility 152 mayprovide enterprise facility 102 computing resources with threatprotection against physical proximity threats 110, for instance, throughscanning the device prior to allowing data transfers, through securityvalidation certificates, through establishing a safe zone within theenterprise facility 102 computing resource to transfer data into forevaluation, and the like.

Now that the overall system has been described, we turn towards a set ofembodiments that apply policies to proxy communications. It should beunderstood that the following embodiments may be managed through athreat management facility 100 along with other services, such as thosedescribed herein.

It should be understood that, in embodiments, a web gateway may includea security facility 152. In this context, the security facility 152 mayin effect eavesdrop on requests and responses that pass through the webgateway. As appropriate and in accordance with one or more policies, thesecurity facility 152 may cause the gateway to drop certain incomingrequests, drop certain incoming responses, prevent the retransmission ofrequests or responses, transmit any of a variety of messages or alerts,and so on. This is described in detail herein and elsewhere.

In some embodiments, client computers or other computing facilities mayinclude the security facility 152. This is described in greater detailhereinabove with reference to FIG. 1 and elsewhere.

Proxy communications may involve a proxy server. The server 142C may bea proxy server outside of the enterprise 102. In some embodiments, theproxy server 142C may be a so-called “anonymizer” that allows a user toindirectly access network content outside of the enterprise 102. Inembodiments, the network content may include websites, web services, anyand all data files or data streams, and so on. In any case, the indirectaccess may enable a user to access the network content via alternateURLs that are directed at the proxy server 142C rather than sourceservers for the content. Throughout this disclosure, proxy servers andanonymizers may be referred to interchangeably except where otherwisestated or clear from the context.

Some security applications, such as and without limitation parentalcontrol type applications, may be directed at restricting access tonetwork content. To perform their intended function, these applicationsmay need to function in a network environment that includes proxyservers.

In embodiments, the present invention may identify a plurality ofwebsite categories, such as content-based categories, securitycategories, and the like. For instance, content-based categories mayinclude adult/sexually explicit, advertisements & pop-ups, alcohol &tobacco, arts, blogs & forums, business, chat, computing & internet,criminal activity, downloads, education, entertainment, fashion &beauty, finance & investment, food & dining, gambling, games,government, hacking, health & medicine, hobbies & recreation, hostingsites, illegal drugs, infrastructure, intimate apparel & swimwear,intolerance & hate, job search & career development, kid's sites, motorvehicles, news, peer-to-peer, personals and dating, philanthropic &professional organizations, phishing & fraud, photo searches, politics,proxies & translators, real estate, reference, religion,ringtones/mobile phone downloads, search engines, sex education,shopping, society & culture, spam URLs, sports, spyware, streamingmedia, tasteless & offensive, travel, violence, weapons, web-basede-mail, custom (user defined), uncategorized, and the like. Forinstance, security categories may include potentially unwantedapplication (PUA)/adware, other/mistyped, PUA/system monitor,other/potentially exploited, PUA/remote, admin tool, pornography/porn,PUA/hacking tool, PUA/other, entertainment/banking, entertainment/games,entertainment/other, communication/cell phones, entertainment/shopping,PUA/dialer, entertainment/sports, entertainment/youth, spam/Chinese,media/ads, spam/drugs, media/news, spam/mortgage, media/TV, spam/other,search/job search, spam/product, spam/Russian, spam/stock, spam/survey,illegal/child abuse, illegal/child pornography, illegal/cracked orpirated software, malware/rat repository, illegal/criminal activities,malware/reference, and the like.

A variety of proxy servers are described herein and still others will beappreciated. In practice, proxy servers may act as anonymizers, mayinsert advertising into network content, may act as a man in the middlethat captures sensitive information such as user names and passwords,and so on. Generally, security applications may detect proxy servers,may monitor or block communications involving proxy servers, and so on.This is described in greater detail hereinafter and elsewhere.

In embodiments, proxy servers 142C may be provided by profit-seekingentities (“proxy providers”) that generate advertising revenue byinserting advertising into network content. For example and withoutlimitation, a user may request a web page from a proxy server bysubmitting an alternate URL to the proxy server. The proxy server mayreceive the alternate URL, convert it to a primary URL, and then requestthe web page from a web server by submitting the primary URL to the webserver. In response to the request, the web server may return the webpage to the proxy server 142C. The proxy server 142C may then insert oneor more advertisements into the web page before returning the web pageto the user. When the user views or interacts with at least one of theadvertisements, advertising revenue (typically from an advertisingnetwork such as Google AdSense, AdBrite, or the like) may be credited toan owner or operator of the proxy server.

In embodiments, the crediting of advertising revenue depends upon aunique account identifier that is embedded within the web page. Thisidentifier may be communicated to the advertising network when the userviews or interacts with an advertisement. Having received thisidentifier, the advertising network may credit advertising revenue tothe entity that delivered the advertisement to the user.

In practice, the advertising network may require that the unique accountidentifier within the web page be encoded in the clear, withoutdeliberate obfuscation or encryption. Moreover, the advertising networkmay require that only one account identifier be associated with eachprofit-seeking entity.

Policies, such as and without limitation those policies describedhereinabove and elsewhere, may dictate that any and all communicationswith proxy servers 142C should be blocked.

Security facilities 152 or the like may eavesdrop on communications ofcomputing facilities within an enterprise 102. Upon recognizing anoutbound communication to a proxy server 142C, these security facilities152 may block the outbound communication in accordance with a policy. Insome embodiments, recognizing the outbound communication may includeextracting a unique account identifier from the communication andmatching that identifier to a database of identifiers that are known tobe associated with proxy providers.

In some embodiments, the threat management facility 100 may include adatabase that contains associations between account identifiers andproxy providers. From time to time, these associations may becommunicated to any and all of the security facilities 152. In someembodiments, any of the security facilities 152 may maintain a localcache or the like of at least some of the associations. Additionally oralternatively, in some embodiments any of the security facilities 152may submit a unique account identifier in a query to the threatmanagement facility 100, which provides an affirmative or negativeresponse depending upon whether or not the unique account identifier isknown by the threat management facility 100 to be associated with aproxy provider.

In some embodiments, the database containing associations betweenaccount identifiers and proxy providers may be updated via manualentries, automated proactive web scanning systems, and so on. It will beunderstood that a variety of such web scanning systems are possible, andall such systems are within the scope of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 depicts a method for enforcing a policy that prohibitscommunications through a proxy server. The method 200 begins at block202, where a user of a computing facility accesses network content at analternate URL. A security facility 152 observes this and eavesdrops onthe network content in transit to the computing facility. As discussedhereinabove, in practice an account identifier may be present in thenetwork content and may be readily accessible by the security facility152.

As shown by block 204, the security facility 152 may check to see if theaccount identifier exists in a database of account identifiers. Asdiscussed hereinabove, in embodiments the database may exist within thesecurity facility 152, within the management facility 100, partiallywithin the security facility 152 and partially within the managementfacility 100, and so on. Also as discussed hereinabove, checking to seeif the account identifier exists in the database may involve directdatabase access via a database query, indirect database access via aquery to a remote system that itself queries the database, and so on. Itwill be understood that a variety of such embodiments are possible.

If the account identifier is in the database, the method 200 proceeds toblock 208. Here, the security facility 152 blocks access to the networkcontent. It will be understood that a variety of techniques may beemployed to block the network content. These techniques may include,without limitation, simply not allowing the network content to transitthe security facility 152, disabling or reconfiguring an application,disabling or reconfiguring a logical or physical network port,transmitting an appropriate message, and so on.

However, if the account identifier is not in the database, the method200 proceeds to block 210. Here, the URL may be transmitted to alaboratory for analysis. In embodiments, the laboratory may include thethreat management facility 100 or any other facility adapted to receiveURLs for analysis.

Analysis of the URL may be conducted as shown by block 212. The analysismay be directed at determining whether the URL refers to a proxy server142C. In some embodiments, the analysis may include accessing thenetwork content at the URL, extracting an account identifier from thenetwork content, and looking up the account identifier in a database ofaccount identifiers that are known or suspected to be associated withproxy providers. In some embodiments, the analysis may include lookingup the URL in a database of known or suspected proxy servers. In someembodiments, the analysis may include inspecting page structure andcontent of the network content. Generally, it will be understood that avariety of analytical systems and methods may be applied to determinewhether the URL refers to a proxy server 142C.

If the laboratory's analysis of the URL indicates that the URL refers toa proxy server 142C, the process 200 may continue to block 214. Here, anaccount identifier from within the network content is added to adatabase of account identifiers of known or suspected proxy providers.Alternatively, the URL may be flagged and stored in a database forfurther review.

If the laboratory's analysis does not indicate an association betweenthe URL and a proxy server then the process 200 may continue to block218 where the URL is ignored.

Although the above examples and descriptions of the method 200 relate toproxy servers, the method 200 is not limited to applications involvingproxy servers. For example and without limitation, an owner/operator ofwebsites may run a number of adult-oriented websites at some number ofdomains. Once the owner/operator's account identifier becomes known, anydomains or URLs found to contain that account identifier could begrouped together by owner/operator. Since in this example theowner/operator is known to be associated with adult-oriented websites,such domains or URLs may also be categorized (if even provisionally so)as being adult-oriented. This categorization may be stored in a databaseor the like, and may be used in the enforcement of policies directed atadult-oriented websites. Thus, generally, the method 200 may be employedto group domains or URLs together by account identifier, to associateowner/operators with domains or URLs, to categorize domains or URLs, andso on.

Continuing on, embodiments of the present invention may identify proxyservers by recognizing a mismatch between a first URL of network contentand an expected URL of the network content. Having so identified a proxyserver, policies that relate to proxy server usage may be employed withrespect to the first URL and the network content from it. In someembodiments, these policies may be directed at blocking requests for thenetwork content at the first URL.

For example and without limitation, network content from Facebook mayhave an expected URL that includes the domain facebook.com. When networkcontent from Facebook appears at a first URL that does not contain thedomain facebook.com, embodiments may identify or suspect the first URLto be that of a proxy server. Thenceforth, a security facility 152 orthe like that enforces the policy may recognize and block requests fornetwork content at the first URL. A variety of other such examples willbe appreciated, including without limitation examples relating to socialnetworking sites, gaming/downloading sites, inappropriate/adult contentsites, banking sites, and so on.

In order to recognize the mismatch, a variety of techniques may beemployed to detect that the network content from the first URL in factoriginates from another URL (i.e., the expected URL). For example, inpractice websites typically contain a number of pages sharing asubstantially consistent look and feel. This consistency may bepreserved as a page is processed and forwarded by a proxy server. Whenthis is the case, the look and feel may be reflected in commoncharacteristics observable by a scanning mechanism at a securityfacility 152. In embodiments the common characteristics may beassociated with the expected URL and may include text such as pagetitles, copyright messages, and the like; specific HTML structuring andlayout; comments within HTML; common attributes, class names, scriptcomponents, and so on; specific image files used as page decoration,particularly and without limitation so-called “favicons”—small graphicalicons used within browsers that are closely tied to a particularwebsite, organization, or brand; links that may not have been translatedby the proxy server; style elements, style sheets, or the like;client-side executable content such as and without limitationJavaScript; elements within HTTP headers returned by a server from whichthe proxy server received the network content; and so on.

In some embodiments, a virus detection application may determine thatnetwork content from one URL in fact originates from another URL.Generally, the virus detection application may process network contentin search of data that matches genes or identities of viruses. However,in such embodiments, genes or identities that match observedcharacteristics of known websites may be created and processed by thevirus detection application as well. Matches according to these genes oridentities may indicate that network content originates from a knownwebsite. Generally, this may be referred to herein and elsewhere asgene-based detection.

Yet another technique may be employed to identify URLs that areassociated with proxy servers. This technique may involve crawling alarge number of popular websites to produce a database of fingerprintsfor each of the websites. Such crawling may occur from time to time. Insome embodiments, the fingerprints may include a checksum, a “fuzzy” orapproximate fingerprint, and so on. In any case, the fingerprints,checksums, or the like may be stored in a database, which may bepublished from time to time. For example and without limitation, thethreat management facility 100 may contain the database and may publishit to one or more of the security facilities 152. In some embodiments,the database may be published to subscribers that have paid for (orotherwise have provided consideration for) the database. In any case,this technique may be referred to herein and elsewhere as fuzzyfingerprinting.

Throughout this disclosure and elsewhere, a checksum may be calculatedin a variety of ways, using any and all techniques for calculating achecksum applied to any and all portions of a website.

In some embodiments, web pages may be decomposed into page-level“objects” by parsing HTML/XML/script content of the web pages. Eachobject and its relationship to the overall page may have a structuraluniqueness. For example, it should be appreciated that a page'sstructure may be represented as a tree of page-level objects. Eachobject in the tree has a unique position within it, and this may relateto the structural uniqueness. For another example, it should beappreciated that, when displayed or rendered into a frame buffer, each(X,Y)-pixel in the page may be set according to one or more objects thatare layered according to a Z-component or the like. In any case, basedupon the structural uniqueness, any and all of the objects (or aspectsthereof) may be identified. Once identified, a checksum of the objectsmay be calculated.

In some embodiments, certain response headers such as cookie headers orthe like may be extracted. Once extracted, a checksum of these headerscould be calculated.

In some embodiments, specific keywords or phrases could be matched usinga fuzzy or simple substring matching on the entire web page. A checksumcould then be calculated on these matched keywords or phrases.

It will be understood that a variety of embodiments for calculating achecksum of a website are possible.

In some embodiments, communications with an uncategorized website may bemonitored for the presence of the fingerprints. When a detectionthreshold is exceeded, the website may be suspected of being anunauthorized republication of a genuine website. In practice, suchrepublication of a website may be provided by a proxy server, amalicious website, or the like. For example and without limitation, anuncategorized website may provide numerous instances of network contentthat match fingerprints that are in the fingerprint database and thatare known from web crawling to be associated with facebook.com. As aresult, the uncategorized website may be re-categorized as suspicious,as a web proxy, or the like. Similarly, if the network content is in thefingerprint database and known to be associated with a bank, theuncategorized website may be categorized as a source of potentialphishing attacks. A variety of other such examples will be appreciated.

When an unauthorized republication of a website is detected, all of theURLs associated with that website may be examined for a longest commonprefix. For example and without limitation, the unauthorizedrepublication may be associated with three URLs:http://www.example.com/foo/bar; http://www.example.com/foo/foo; andhttp://www.example.com/foo/baz. In this example, the longest commonprefix is http://www.example.com/foo. In embodiments, the longest commonprefix may be stored in a database and communicated to securityfacilities 152. In some embodiments, any and all URLs beginning with thelongest common prefix may be deemed URLs of unauthorized reproductionsof network content.

When an unauthorized reproduction of a website is suspected, aconfidence level may be assigned to that suspicion. In embodiments, theconfidence level may be stored in a database, communicated to securityfacilities, and so on.

Depending upon the confidence level, a variety of actions may be takenwhen URLs associated with the reproduction are accessed. Such actionsmay without limitation include blocking a request to the networkresource at the URL, blocking a response from the network resource atthe URL, logging such requests or responses, and so on.

When the confidence level rises to a sufficient level, the URLs may beadded to a list of detected proxy sites. A user may review this list forfalse positives, and provide an indication of the false positives. Insome embodiments, this review may take place via a web browser withcheckbox or other input elements for receiving the input. A variety ofsuch embodiments will be understood.

In some embodiments, an indication of the detection of an unauthorizedreproduction and the confidence level may be communicated to the threatmanagement facility 100 for further analysis or distribution to securityfacilities 152.

FIG. 3 depicts a method of detecting proxies. The method 300 begins atblock 302 where network content from a server arrives from a server at aURL. In block 304 the network content may be processed by a method thatidentifies an anonymizer or by a method that identifies the origin ofweb content, as described hereinabove or elsewhere. Any of a number ofsystems and methods may be employed to detect content. Two of thesemethods are described herein and elsewhere as gene-based detection(method 1) and fuzzy fingerprinting (method 2). In any case, whennetwork content is recognized, the test at block 308 produces a positiveresult and the method 300 continues to block 310. Otherwise, the sourceof the network content is not a proxy and the method 300 ends at block314.

At block 310, a test determines whether the network content's URL isvalid. If it is, the source of the network content is not a proxy andthe method 300 ends at block 312. However, if the network content's URLis invalid (e.g., when the network content is known to originate fromanother URL) then the URL may be added to a list of possible proxies, asshown by block 318. From there, a test determines whether the URL isalready flagged as a potential proxy (block 320). If it is not alreadyflagged, the URL may be that of a proxy and an appropriate result isreturned at block 330. On the other hand, when the URL is alreadyflagged, another test (block 322) may determine whether the URL's hosthas been previously observed serving content from a differentoriginating website. If not, the URL may be that of a proxy and anappropriate result is returned at block 332. If so, the URL is probablya proxy and an appropriate result is returned at block 328.

FIG. 4 depicts a method of detecting proxies. The method 400 begins atblock 402 where network content arrives from a server at a URL. If theURL is a trusted location then the network content is passed along to arequesting client or user as shown by the path through block 404 toblock 422. Otherwise, as shown by block 408, the network content may beprocessed by a method that identifies content, such as and withoutlimitation gene-based detection (method 1) or fuzzy fingerprinting(method 2). If either of these methods determines that the networkcontent contains malware, then delivery or operation of the networkcontent may be blocked as shown by the path through block 410 to block424. Otherwise, the test at block 410 returns a negative result and themethod 400 continues to block 412.

If the URL is categorized, then the network content may be processedaccording to policy rules relating to the URL's category (as shown bythe path through 412 to 414). However, if the URL is not categorized,then the method 400 may continue with block 308 as described hereinabovewith reference to FIG. 3.

FIG. 5 depicts a method of detecting proxies and suspected phishingsites. The method 500 begins from block 302 and proceeds in the samemanner as the method 300 described hereinabove with reference to FIG. 3,except as follows: When the test at block 310 produces a negativeresult, the method 500 proceeds to block 520 where a test determineswhether the network content is from a backing or financial website. Ifit is, then the URL of the website is added to a list of potentialphishing sites as shown by block 504. Then, the network content and anyrequest associated with it may be blocked as shown by block 508. Fromhere, as from the negative branch from block 502, the method 500 maycontinue to block 318, which is described in detail hereinabove.

In practice, users may learn of proxy servers via a web search engine.In some embodiments, a security facility 152 may block searchescontaining search terms that are related to finding a proxy server. Forexample and without limitation, the security facility 152 may block asearch phrase containing the terms “proxy” or “unblock facebook” or thelike.

A database within the threat management facility 100 or the securityfacility 152 may contain disallowed search keywords. In embodiments, thedatabase may contain keywords that are provided by a manufacturer orprovider of the threat management facility 100 or security facility 152.In some embodiments, the database may contain user-provided keywords.

In embodiments, searches may be submitted to search engines via a URLthat contains the search phrase. Major search engines use establisheddomain names in their URLs (e.g., google.com yahoo.com, et cetera) andsuch URLs may be singled out for processing. The processing may examinethese URLs for disallowed keywords.

For example and without limitation, the following URL may be singled outon the basis of the domain name (google.com); subsequent processing ofthe URL may reveal the keyword “proxy”:

http ://www.google.com/search?h1=en&q=proxy&btnG=Google+Search&meta=

A variety of techniques for processing such URLs will be appreciated.All such techniques are intended to fall within the scope of the presentdisclosure.

In some embodiments, the database may include regular expressions thatmatch disallowed search keywords or disallowed search URLs. The regularexpressions may be directed at prefix matching, suffix matching,wildcard/substitution matching, and so on.

FIG. 6 depicts a method of selectively blocking access to a searchengine. In particular, this method 600 may disallow queries containingcertain keywords, matching certain regular expressions, or the like. Themethod begins with a user 602 entering a search word or search phraseinto a search engine input screen. This screen may include a web browserwindow, an applet window, or the like. It will be understood that avariety of embodiments of the screen are possible. In any case, theuser's input may be translated into a URL that contains the search wordor search phrase.

Next, as shown by the transition 604, the URL may be transmitted to aweb security system. This system may, without limitation, include asecurity facility 152.

Then, as shown by the transition 608, the following may occur: The websecurity system may extract keywords from the URL and then query adatabase to see if these keywords are disallowed. The database mayrespond as appropriate. In some embodiments, the database may beintegral to the web security system.

In some embodiments, the database may be a separate application from theweb security system. In some embodiments, the web security system maylocally or remotely access the database. Still other embodiments of thedatabase will be appreciated.

When the web security systems determines that one or more of thekeywords in the URL as disallowed, the web security system may transmitan “access denied” message or the like (transition 610). In someembodiments, this message may include an HTML status code such as “403Forbidden,” “404 Not Found,” and so on. It will be understood that avariety of embodiments of the message are possible.

Regarding all of the foregoing, some embodiments of the presentinvention may categorize a website with the same category by identifyingoperator identification information. This information may include anaccount identifier, as described hereinabove and elsewhere. Withoutlimitation, a website may be categorized as a proxy, an adult website, ablocked website, an allowed, website, a gaming website, a socialnetworking website, a safe website, a job search website, an ecommercewebsite, and so on. Depending upon the categorization, in someembodiments, communications with the website may be blocked or allowed;an alert may be triggered; the categorization or related communicationsmay be logged; another site-type detection action may be initiated; andso on.

Some embodiments of the present invention may identify a proxy site bydiscovering the operator identification information. Without limitation,the proxy site may serve a reproduction of an adult website, a blockedwebsite, an allowed website, a gaming website, a social network website,a safe website, a job search website, an ecommerce website, and so on.Depending upon the identification, in some embodiments, communicationswith the website may be blocked or allowed; an alert may be triggered;the identification or related communications may be logged; anothersite-type detection action may be initiated; and so on.

Some embodiments of the present invention may identify a proxy site bydiscovering advertising identification information, which may include anaccount identifier. Without limitation, the proxy site may serve areproduction of an adult website, a blocked website, an allowed website,a gaming website, a social network website, a safe website, a job searchwebsite, an ecommerce website, and so on. Depending upon theidentification, in some embodiments, communications with the website maybe blocked or allowed; an alert may be triggered; the identification orrelated communications may be logged; another site-type detection actionmay be initiated; and so on.

Some embodiments of the present invention may identify a blockedcategory of website based on a search engine request URL. The blockedcategory may include a proxy category, an adult category, a gamingcategory, a social network category, a safe category, a job searchcategory, an ecommerce category, and so on. Depending upon the category,in some embodiments, communications with the search engine may beblocked or allowed; an alert may be triggered; the category of thewebsite or related communications may be logged; another site-typedetection action may be initiated; and so on.

Some embodiments of the present invention may identify a blocked websitebased in a search engine request URL. The blocked website may be servedby a proxy server; may be an adult, gaming, social networking, safe, jobsearch, or ecommerce website; and so on. In some embodiments,communications with the blocked website may be blocked or allowed; maytrigger an alert; may be logged; may initiate another site-typedetection action; and so on.

Some embodiments of the present invention may categorize a proxy websitebased upon similarities between the network content it delivers and thenetwork content delivered that a non-proxy website delivers. The proxywebsite may be served by a proxy sever and may include network contentthat is blocked or allowed, that is designated as safe, or that isassociated with gaming, social networking, job searching, ecommerce, andso on. In some embodiments, communications with the proxy website may beblocked or allowed, may trigger an alert, may be logged, may initiateanother site-type detection action, and so on.

Some embodiments of the present invention may identify portions ofwebsites as suspicious based upon a checksum comparison with proxysites. The portions of the websites may be served by a proxy server andmay include network content that is blocked or allowed, that isdesignated as safe, or that is associated with gaming, socialnetworking, job searching, ecommerce, and so on. In some embodiments,communications related to the portions of the websites may be blocked orallowed, may trigger an alert, may be logged, may initiate anothersite-type detection action, and so on.

Some embodiments of the present invention may detect uncategorizedweb-based proxy sites by identifying an embedded secondary URL. A proxyserver may embed this secondary URL into network content. For exampleand without limitation the secondary URL may be enable advertising fromwhich an owner/operator of the proxy server profits. In any case, thenetwork content or the secondary URL may be associated with adultcontent, blocked content, allowed content, gaming content, socialnetworking content, safe content, job search content, ecommerce content,and so on. In some embodiments, communications including the secondaryURL or related to the web-based proxy sites may be blocked or allowed,may trigger an alert, may be logged, may initiate another site-typedetection action, and so on.

Embodiments of the present invention may apply virus detectiontechniques to identify websites; apply “fuzzy” document fingerprintingtechniques to identify web content; and compare the result of theforegoing with an associated URL to make a determination about thevalidity of the web content's origin. Embodiments may be directed atdetecting other abuses of known websites. For example and withoutlimitation, detection of phishing attacks, cyber squatters, or typosquatters may be detected. A variety of applications will beappreciated, and all such applications are intended to fall within thescope of the present disclosure.

The methods and systems described herein may be deployed in part or inwhole through a machine that executes computer software, program codes,and/or instructions on a processor. The processor may be part of aserver, client, network infrastructure, mobile computing platform,stationary computing platform, or other computing platform. A processormay be any kind of computational or processing device capable ofexecuting program instructions, codes, binary instructions and the like.The processor may be or include a signal processor, digital processor,embedded processor, microprocessor or any variant such as a co-processor(math co-processor, graphic co-processor, communication co-processor andthe like) and the like that may directly or indirectly facilitateexecution of program code or program instructions stored thereon. Inaddition, the processor may enable execution of multiple programs,threads, and codes. The threads may be executed simultaneously toenhance the performance of the processor and to facilitate simultaneousoperations of the application. By way of implementation, methods,program codes, program instructions and the like described herein may beimplemented in one or more thread. The thread may spawn other threadsthat may have assigned priorities associated with them; the processormay execute these threads based on priority or any other order based oninstructions provided in the program code. The processor may includememory that stores methods, codes, instructions and programs asdescribed herein and elsewhere. The processor may access a storagemedium through an interface that may store methods, codes, andinstructions as described herein and elsewhere. The storage mediumassociated with the processor for storing methods, programs, codes,program instructions or other type of instructions capable of beingexecuted by the computing or processing device may include but may notbe limited to one or more of a CD-ROM, DVD, memory, hard disk, flashdrive, RAM, ROM, cache and the like.

A processor may include one or more cores that may enhance speed andperformance of a multiprocessor. In embodiments, the process may be adual core processor, quad core processors, other chip-levelmultiprocessor and the like that combine two or more independent cores(called a die).

The methods and systems described herein may be deployed in part or inwhole through a machine that executes computer software on a server,client, firewall, gateway, hub, router, or other such computer and/ornetworking hardware. The software program may be associated with aserver that may include a file server, print server, domain server,internet server, intranet server and other variants such as secondaryserver, host server, distributed server and the like. The server mayinclude one or more of memories, processors, computer readable media,storage media, ports (physical and virtual), communication devices, andinterfaces capable of accessing other servers, clients, machines, anddevices through a wired or a wireless medium, and the like. The methods,programs or codes as described herein and elsewhere may be executed bythe server. In addition, other devices required for execution of methodsas described in this application may be considered as a part of theinfrastructure associated with the server.

The server may provide an interface to other devices including, withoutlimitation, clients, other servers, printers, database servers, printservers, file servers, communication servers, distributed servers andthe like. Additionally, this coupling and/or connection may facilitateremote execution of program across the network. The networking of someor all of these devices may facilitate parallel processing of a programor method at one or more location without deviating from the scope ofthe invention. In addition, any of the devices attached to the serverthrough an interface may include at least one storage medium capable ofstoring methods, programs, code and/or instructions. A centralrepository may provide program instructions to be executed on differentdevices. In this implementation, the remote repository may act as astorage medium for program code, instructions, and programs.

The software program may be associated with a client that may include afile client, print client, domain client, internet client, intranetclient and other variants such as secondary client, host client,distributed client and the like. The client may include one or more ofmemories, processors, computer readable media, storage media, ports(physical and virtual), communication devices, and interfaces capable ofaccessing other clients, servers, machines, and devices through a wiredor a wireless medium, and the like. The methods, programs or codes asdescribed herein and elsewhere may be executed by the client. Inaddition, other devices required for execution of methods as describedin this application may be considered as a part of the infrastructureassociated with the client.

The client may provide an interface to other devices including, withoutlimitation, servers, other clients, printers, database servers, printservers, file servers, communication servers, distributed servers andthe like. Additionally, this coupling and/or connection may facilitateremote execution of program across the network. The networking of someor all of these devices may facilitate parallel processing of a programor method at one or more location without deviating from the scope ofthe invention. In addition, any of the devices attached to the clientthrough an interface may include at least one storage medium capable ofstoring methods, programs, applications, code and/or instructions. Acentral repository may provide program instructions to be executed ondifferent devices. In this implementation, the remote repository may actas a storage medium for program code, instructions, and programs.

The methods and systems described herein may be deployed in part or inwhole through network infrastructures. The network infrastructure mayinclude elements such as computing devices, servers, routers, hubs,firewalls, clients, personal computers, communication devices, routingdevices and other active and passive devices, modules and/or componentsas known in the art. The computing and/or non-computing device(s)associated with the network infrastructure may include, apart from othercomponents, a storage medium such as flash memory, buffer, stack, RAM,ROM and the like. The processes, methods, program codes, instructionsdescribed herein and elsewhere may be executed by one or more of thenetwork infrastructural elements.

The methods, program codes, and instructions described herein andelsewhere may be implemented on a cellular network having multiplecells. The cellular network may either be frequency division multipleaccess (FDMA) network or code division multiple access (CDMA) network.The cellular network may include mobile devices, cell sites, basestations, repeaters, antennas, towers, and the like. The cell networkmay be a GSM, GPRS, 3G, EVDO, mesh, or other networks types.

The methods, programs codes, and instructions described herein andelsewhere may be implemented on or through mobile devices. The mobiledevices may include navigation devices, cell phones, mobile phones,mobile personal digital assistants, laptops, palmtops, netbooks, pagers,electronic books readers, music players and the like. These devices mayinclude, apart from other components, a storage medium such as a flashmemory, buffer, RAM, ROM and one or more computing devices. Thecomputing devices associated with mobile devices may be enabled toexecute program codes, methods, and instructions stored thereon.Alternatively, the mobile devices may be configured to executeinstructions in collaboration with other devices. The mobile devices maycommunicate with base stations interfaced with servers and configured toexecute program codes. The mobile devices may communicate on a peer topeer network, mesh network, or other communications network. The programcode may be stored on the storage medium associated with the server andexecuted by a computing device embedded within the server. The basestation may include a computing device and a storage medium. The storagedevice may store program codes and instructions executed by thecomputing devices associated with the base station.

The computer software, program codes, and/or instructions may be storedand/or accessed on machine readable media that may include: computercomponents, devices, and recording media that retain digital data usedfor computing for some interval of time; semiconductor storage known asrandom access memory (RAM); mass storage typically for more permanentstorage, such as optical discs, forms of magnetic storage like harddisks, tapes, drums, cards and other types; processor registers, cachememory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory; optical storage such asCD, DVD; removable media such as flash memory (e.g. USB sticks or keys),floppy disks, magnetic tape, paper tape, punch cards, standalone RAMdisks, Zip drives, removable mass storage, off-line, and the like; othercomputer memory such as dynamic memory, static memory, read/writestorage, mutable storage, read only, random access, sequential access,location addressable, file addressable, content addressable, networkattached storage, storage area network, bar codes, magnetic ink, and thelike.

The methods and systems described herein may transform physical and/oror intangible items from one state to another. The methods and systemsdescribed herein may also transform data representing physical and/orintangible items from one state to another.

The elements described and depicted herein, including in flow charts andblock diagrams throughout the figures, imply logical boundaries betweenthe elements. However, according to software or hardware engineeringpractices, the depicted elements and the functions thereof may beimplemented on machines through computer executable media having aprocessor capable of executing program instructions stored thereon as amonolithic software structure, as standalone software modules, or asmodules that employ external routines, code, services, and so forth, orany combination of these, and all such implementations may be within thescope of the present disclosure. Examples of such machines may include,but may not be limited to, personal digital assistants, laptops,personal computers, mobile phones, other handheld computing devices,medical equipment, wired or wireless communication devices, transducers,chips, calculators, satellites, tablet PCs, electronic books, gadgets,electronic devices, devices having artificial intelligence, computingdevices, networking equipments, servers, routers and the like.Furthermore, the elements depicted in the flow chart and block diagramsor any other logical component may be implemented on a machine capableof executing program instructions. Thus, while the foregoing drawingsand descriptions set forth functional aspects of the disclosed systems,no particular arrangement of software for implementing these functionalaspects should be inferred from these descriptions unless explicitlystated or otherwise clear from the context. Similarly, it will beappreciated that the various steps identified and described above may bevaried, and that the order of steps may be adapted to particularapplications of the techniques disclosed herein. All such variations andmodifications are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure.As such, the depiction and/or description of an order for various stepsshould not be understood to require a particular order of execution forthose steps, unless required by a particular application, or explicitlystated or otherwise clear from the context.

The methods and/or processes described above, and steps thereof, may berealized in hardware, software or any combination of hardware andsoftware suitable for a particular application. The hardware may includea general purpose computer and/or dedicated computing device or specificcomputing device or particular aspect or component of a specificcomputing device. The processes may be realized in one or moremicroprocessors, microcontrollers, embedded microcontrollers,programmable digital signal processors or other programmable device,along with internal and/or external memory. The processes may also, orinstead, be embodied in an application specific integrated circuit, aprogrammable gate array, programmable array logic, or any other deviceor combination of devices that may be configured to process electronicsignals. It will further be appreciated that one or more of theprocesses may be realized as a computer executable code capable of beingexecuted on a machine readable medium.

The computer executable code may be created using a structuredprogramming language such as C, an object oriented programming languagesuch as C++, or any other high-level or low-level programming language(including assembly languages, hardware description languages, anddatabase programming languages and technologies) that may be stored,compiled or interpreted to run on one of the above devices, as well asheterogeneous combinations of processors, processor architectures, orcombinations of different hardware and software, or any other machinecapable of executing program instructions.

Thus, in one aspect, each method described above and combinationsthereof may be embodied in computer executable code that, when executingon one or more computing devices, performs the steps thereof. In anotheraspect, the methods may be embodied in systems that perform the stepsthereof, and may be distributed across devices in a number of ways, orall of the functionality may be integrated into a dedicated, standalonedevice or other hardware. In another aspect, the means for performingthe steps associated with the processes described above may include anyof the hardware and/or software described above. All such permutationsand combinations are intended to fall within the scope of the presentdisclosure.

While the invention has been disclosed in connection with the preferredembodiments shown and described in detail, various modifications andimprovements thereon will become readily apparent to those skilled inthe art. Accordingly, the spirit and scope of the present invention isnot to be limited by the foregoing examples, but is to be understood inthe broadest sense allowable by law.

All documents referenced herein are hereby incorporated by reference.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer program product for enforcing policieswith respect to anonymizer proxy communications, the computer programproduct comprising computer-executable code embodied in a non-transitorycomputer readable medium that, when executing on one or more computers,performs the steps of: analyzing, at a web gateway for an enterprisenetwork, website HTML content that is retrieved based on a websiterequest from a computing facility within the enterprise network bylooking for patterns within the website HTML content that are similar topatterns found in a known non-proxy website's HTML content throughinspecting website page structure and the website HTML contentdelivered; in response to finding a similar pattern between therequested website and the known non-proxy website, comparing therequested website's identifier with an identifier of the known non-proxywebsite; in response to finding a mismatch between the two websiteidentifiers, categorizing at least a portion of the requested website'sidentifier as associated with an anonymizer proxy used to indirectlyaccess network content outside the enterprise network while obscuring asender or receiver of information, wherein categorizing at least aportion of the requested website's identifier as a suspect proxy websiteidentifier involves determining a longest common portion of URLsrequested of the requested website and categorizing the longest commonportion as indicative of a proxy website; and blocking access by thecomputing facility to content at the requested website's identifieraccording to the policy for anonymizer proxy communications.
 2. Thecomputer program product of claim 1, wherein the known non-proxy website is one of a plurality of known non-proxy web sites that have beenpredetermined as known non-proxy web sites.
 3. The computer programproduct of claim 2, wherein signature content from the plurality ofknown non-proxy websites is stored in a database and the analysisinvolves retrieving the signature content and comparing the signaturecontent to content derived from the retrieved website.
 4. The computerprogram product of claim 3, wherein the signature content is prioritizedbased on the non-proxy websites popularity such that more popularsignature content is used in the analysis before less popular content.5. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the step ofanalyzing the website HTML content that is retrieved based on thewebsite request further comprises: analyzing a plurality of content,retrieved based on a plurality of requests made by the requestedwebsite, for a significant number of content portions that includepatterns matching the known non-proxy website.
 6. The computer programproduct of claim 1, wherein the step of looking for patterns within thewebsite HTML content that are similar to patterns found in the knownnon-proxy website's HTML content involves comparing text associated withthe two websites for similarities.
 7. The computer program product ofclaim 1, wherein the step of looking for patterns within the websiteHTML content that are similar to patterns found in the known non-proxyweb site's HTML content involves comparing copyright messages associatedwith the two websites for similarities.
 8. The computer program productof claim 1, wherein the step of looking for patterns within the websiteHTML content that are similar to patterns found in the known non-proxywebsite's HTML content involves comparing comments within HTMLassociated with the two websites for similarities.
 9. The computerprogram product of claim 1, wherein the step of looking for patternswithin the website HTML content that are similar to patterns found inthe known non-proxy website's HTML content involves comparing classnames associated with the two websites for similarities.
 10. Thecomputer program product of claim 1, wherein the step of looking forpatterns within the website HTML content that are similar to patternsfound in the known non-proxy web site's HTML content involves comparingscript components associated with the two websites for similarities. 11.The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the step of looking forpatterns within the website HTML content that are similar to patternsfound in the known non-proxy website's HTML content involves comparingimages associated with the two websites for similarities.
 12. Thecomputer program product of claim 1, wherein the step of looking forpatterns within the website HTML content that are similar to patternsfound in the known non-proxy website's HTML content involves comparinglinks associated with the two websites for similarities.
 13. Thecomputer program product of claim 1, wherein the step of looking forpatterns within the website HTML content that are similar to patternsfound in the known non-proxy website's HTML content involves comparingstyle elements associated with the two websites for similarities. 14.The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the step of looking forpatterns within the website HTML content that are similar to patternsfound in the known non-proxy website's HTML content involves comparingclient side executable content associated with the two websites forsimilarities.
 15. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein thepatterns are characterized as checksums.
 16. The computer programproduct of claim 1 wherein the requested website's identifier includes aUniform Resource Locator.
 17. A method for enforcing policies withrespect to anonymizer proxy communications, the method comprising:analyzing, at a web gateway for an enterprise network, website HTMLcontent that is retrieved based on a website request from a computingfacility within the enterprise network by looking for patterns withinthe website HTML content that are similar to patterns found in a knownnon-proxy website's HTML content through inspecting website pagestructure and the website HTML content delivered; in response to findinga similar pattern between the requested website and the known non-proxywebsite, comparing the requested website's identifier with an identifierof the known non-proxy website; in response to finding a mismatchbetween the two website identifiers, categorizing at least a portion ofthe requested website's identifier as associated with an anonymizerproxy used to indirectly access network content outside the enterprisenetwork while obscuring a sender or receiver of information, whereincategorizing at least a portion of the requested website's identifier asa suspect website identifier involves determining a longest commonportion of URLs requested of the requested website and categorizing thelongest common portion as indicative of a proxy website; and blockingaccess by the computing facility to content at the requested website'sidentifier according to the policy for anonymizer proxy communications.18. The method of claim 17, wherein the known non-proxy website is oneof a plurality of known non-proxy web sites that have been predeterminedas known non-proxy web sites.